‘A testimony to them.’ This demonstrates that his silence was to endure only until he came to the priest. A military word. that, committing himself to the examination of the priest, he might be accounted among the clean. Now it happened, as He went into the house of one of the rulers of the Pharisees to eat bread on the Sabbath, that they watched Him closely. . Jesus did not want this man to fail to go to Jerusalem and present the required offering for the healing of leprosy ( Leviticus 14:1-32). BibliographyTorrey, R. A. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/geb/luke-5.html. Aristoph. To tell no man (μηδενι ειπειν — mēdeni eipein).This is an indirect command after the verb “charged” (παρηγγειλεν — parēggeilen).But Luke changes (constructio variata) to the direct quotation, a common idiom in Greek and often in Luke (Acts 1:4. Copyright StatementThese files are public domain. Abilene Christian University Press, Abilene, Texas, USA. The restored person was then touched on the tip of the right ear, the right thumb and the right great toe with blood from the guilt offering and, after the oil had been sprinkled seven times before the Lord, with oil. 1999. From among the great number of miracles which Jesus performed at this time, it seems to have been only those which had something marked to distinguish them, that were particularly recorded. BibliographyPoole, Matthew, "Commentary on Luke 5:14". but go show thyself to the priest. The student should read for himself the intensely interesting and symbolic rites commanded by Moses for the legal pronunciation of a leper clean in Leviticus 14. 3. de quæst. "Commentary on Luke 5:14". No shrinking from the loathsome disease.— ἡ λέπρα ἀπῆλθεν: Lk. They occupy fourteen chapters of Negaîm, one of the treatises of the Mishnah. 1. directa as in Acts 1:4; Acts 14:22, etc.— τῷ ἱερεῖ, to the priest; not necessarily in Jerusalem, but to the priest in the province whose business it was to attend to such duties (Hahn). Then Jesus bade him not to tell anyone, but to obey the Law of Moses and go on his way to the Temple in Jerusalem, and show himself to a priest, who would be able to examine him and pass his verdict on whether his skin disease was cleansed. Study the bible online using commentary on Luke 5 and more! 1983-1999. Luke 5:14. A reference to Leviticus 14:4-10 will shew how heavy an expense the offering entailed. "Commentary on Luke 5:14". https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/hcc/luke-5.html. https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/bcc/luke-5.html. See my Brief Greek Syntax, p. 199. This seems like a strange command, but we will see why Jesus made this command in verse 15. See discussion there about the direction to go to the priest to receive a certificate showing his cleansing, like our release from quarantine (Leviticus 13:39; 14:2-32). Aristotle uses it of a physician: to prescribe. "Commentary on Luke 5:14". It should be noted that we have in this passage a demonstration of Jesus’ loyalty to the Law, and that this comes prior to a number of cases where He is challenged concerning His loyalty to the Law. The remainder of the oil was then put on his head. the other. BibliographyConstable, Thomas. "Commentary on Luke 5:14". And while people continued to flock to Him He found it very difficult to find quiet places where He could meet with His Father. ‘And he charged him to tell no man: “But go your way, and show yourself to the priest, and offer for your cleansing what Moses commanded, for a testimony to them.’. 1887. John Trapp Complete Commentary. he has already established His bona fides. He was to show himself to the priest and offer the prescribed gift as a witness of what Jesus had done. See on Mark 1:43. Luke 7:22). Seven days later he was re-examined. Luke 5:14 New International Version (NIV). See for all this Leviticus 14. "Commentary on Luke 5:14". 1896. Therefore the man"s "testimony" to his cleansing amounted to an announcement of Messiah"s arrival. εἰς μαρτύριον αὐτοῖς, i.e. BibliographyAbbott, John S. C. & Abbott, Jacob. "Abbott's Illustrated New Testament". 1863-1878. "Commentary on Luke 5:14". BibliographyRobertson, A.T. "Commentary on Luke 5:14". The nets are filled to overflowing, and so is the boat! evang.) : here the oratio indirecta passes into or. The figurative sacrifices were not to be abrogated, before that, which they prefigured, was established by the preaching of the apostles, and the faith of Christian believers. The man then washed himself and his clothes and shaved himself. Note On What Was Involved Before The Priests. 14.] https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/pet/luke-5.html. These files were made available by Mr. Ernie Stefanik. All other rights reserved. In honoring such regulations, Christ made clear his intention not to destroy the law and the prophets, but to fulfill them. "Commentary on Luke 5:14". https:https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/rwp/luke-5.html. (St. Ambrose) --- Jesus Christ seems here to approve of the legal sacrifices, which the Church does not receive; and this he did, because he had not yet established that most holy of all holy sacrifices, the sacrifice of his own body. BibliographyGill, John. Used by Permission. (St. Augustine, quest. New York, USA. Moses. "E.W. Then he must make the usual offerings as a testimony to the priests of what God had done. The man whom Christ had made whole he found in the temple, Jn. All Rightes Reserved, Larry Pierce, Winterbourne, Ontario.A printed copy of this work can be ordered from: The Baptist Standard Bearer, 1 Iron Oaks Dr, Paris, AR, 72855. 1909-1922. And he charged him to tell no man: but go, and shew thyself to the priest, and offer for thy cleansing, according as Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them. In Luke 9:5; Mark 6:11 the words mean ‘for a witness against them;’ and although St Luke’s phrase is not very definite, it may imply ‘for an evidence to the priests that I do not neglect the Mosaic Law’ (Matthew 5:17). The conditional negative: no one that he might chance to meet. The other two were offered as a sin offering and a burnt offering. The distinguishing circumstance in this case, perhaps, was, that the disease was the leprosy. BibliographyHaydock, George Leo. Nub. "Commentary on Luke 5:14". ). BibliographyBullinger, Ethelbert William. 1859. charged. he clothed himself with our human nature, that we might be cleansed from our former errors, and might offer in return for this favour our bodies, a living sacrifice to God. The offering of the sacrifices would be witness to the fact that the man was clean. Copyright StatementThese files are public domain and are a derivative of an electronic edition that is available on the Christian Classics Ethereal Library Website. Bede). BibliographyCoffman, James Burton. It may also have been in order to prevent people coming to see Jesus as a spectacle, and in order to stress that it was primarily not in order to heal that He had come. "The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge". First of all, to tell no one. But Luke may have intended the double entendre. --- By this our Saviour would testify to the priest, that this man was healed not by the ordination of the law, but by the power of grace, which is above the law. Copyright StatementThese files are public domain and are a derivative of an electronic edition that is available on the Christian Classics Ethereal Library Website. Luke 5:14 - And He ordered him to tell no one, Robertson's Word Pictures in the New Testament. He likewise shews that he did not come to destroy, but to fulfil the law.

Automotive Upholstery Supplies Near Me, Inconel Vs Stainless Steel Temperature, Porter Cable 340 Sander Parts, Essay About Dreams And Goals, English Walnut Vs Black Walnut Leaves, 3 Pin Amphenol To Xlr, Myq App Work Light Error,